! HAPPY NEW YEAR!
The year 2010 was a year very productive for the advancement of CSR. Among other things, were made significant progress in sustainability reports, increased media coverage, created specialized media, continued the multiple conferences, won approval from ISO Guide 26000, ending with the Cancun Summit surpassing low expectations had and reached settlements with some implications for environmental performance and to a lesser half, social, of large enterprises.
In the blog "A critical look at the Corporate Social Responsibility in Latin America ( http://www.cumpletere.blogspot.com/ ) published 24 articles of which we have selected the six most read and commented.
A recurring topic covered and we offer three selections below, was the awards and certifications. Still continuously increasing responsibility awards. Has discovered a seemingly endless streak advertising: companies award prizes. The institutions that provide cheap get media coverage. There is nothing more appealing to readers that a list or ranking. Companies also get advertising revenue. With win-win prizes, there is a demand that is satisfied with an offer (but do harm, such as cigarettes). Unfortunately the vast majority, as shown by the articles, have serious design flaws (in a forthcoming article write about the features that should have the prizes they want to be trusted). In the certifications, discussion and approval of the Guide ISO 26000 certifiable not excited to public and private institutions offering CSR certifications. It is developing a major industry around this issue, that will explode in coming years. We are in this industry as preparation of reports was about three or four years.
GRI Awards for best sustainability report:! Fallacy!
Virginity, awards and social responsibility
Accreditation " socially responsible business?
Depending on the major criticisms of sustainability indices, the result mainly of inclusion and exclusion of BP, after the spill in the Gulf of Mexico, published a lengthy article to clarify teaching what they are and are not these indices, objectives and practices that have and use should not have. He was named second article on CSR in the TOP 5 of 2010 for ECODES (and the first in English)
What are the indices of sustainability?
also published two humorous articles were well received, in fact one of them was the most widely read and discussed. Meanwhile serious article we wanted to bring some levity to the issue and confirmed that many need to escape some of the high pressures of everyday life. Article How do they look ... ... ...? unfortunately some did not see him grace and took it very seriously. It is no less true that the article was intended to make "a critical look", but like all humor, caricature a bit.
More names for CSR and CSR: We need a dictionary
what seem ........?
0 comments:
Post a Comment